Re: gnulib update policy

[Andrei Borzenkov]

В Thu, 5 Mar 2015 19:23:35 +0100
"Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <address@hidden> пишет:

> Thank you. Do you know how big the gnulib update would be?

I was reluctant to do full update before 2.02. Even external-inline.m4
contains far more changes than I would prefer in this case.

Here is git diff --shortstat for files included in grub assuming they
do not have additional dependencies.

 115 files changed, 1003 insertions(+), 521 deletions(-)


> В Fri, 23 Jan 2015 21:38:59 +0300
> Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden> пишет:
> 
> > В Sun, 7 Dec 2014 20:34:57 +0300
> > Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden> пишет:
> >
> > > I have two pending patches for gnulib; each one is included upstream.
> > > What is the policy in this case - update individual files, add patches
> > > to be applied at autogen step or update from upstream (latter I'd
> > > rather avoid at this stage)?
> >
> > ping?
> 
> I went ahead and committed both. They fix obvious bugs, they are self
> contained and do not depend on anything else, they are upstream.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel