grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v2] Add a module for retrieving SMBIOS information


From: Rajat Jain
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Add a module for retrieving SMBIOS information
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:26:29 +0000

Hello,

Just wanted to check on the status of this patch. Has it been accepted / merged?

Thanks,

Rajat


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Michael [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 7:11 PM
> To: Andrei Borzenkov
> Cc: The development of GNU GRUB; Prarit Bhargava; Leif Lindholm; Rajat
> Jain; Sanjay Jain; Raghuraman Thirumalairajan; Stu Grossman
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Add a module for retrieving SMBIOS information
> 
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > В Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:54:46 -0500
> > David Michael <address@hidden> пишет:
> >> address@hidden
> >> +Specifying @option{-t} will only print entries with a matching
> >> address@hidden  The type can be any value from 0 to 255.  Specify a
> >> +value outside this range to match entries with any type.  The default is -
> 1.
> >
> > I think out of range value should result in error.
> 
> Okay, but I think the user should still be able to specify a value that can
> remove a previously specified type.  Maybe a separate long option "--no-
> type" or a magic value like "-t any"?
> 
> >> +  /* Write the entry's mandatory four header bytes. */  length =
> >> + ptr[1];  grub_printf ("Entry: Type=0x%02x Length=0x%02x
> >> + Handle=0x%04x\n",
> >> +               ptr[0], length, *(1 + (grub_uint16_t *)ptr));
> >
> > Could you reverse the order in 1 + (grub_uint16_t *)ptr and in other
> > places too?
> 
> I'll replace all these pointer casts+dereferences with functions that avoid
> alignment issues.
> 
> >> +  /* Dump of the formatted area (including the header) in hex. */
> >> + grub_printf (" Hex Dump: ");  while (length-- > 0)
> >> +    grub_printf ("%02x", *ptr++);
> >> +  grub_printf ("\n");
> >> +
> >> +  /* Print each string found in the appended string list. */  while
> >> + (ptr[0] != 0 || ptr[1] != 0)
> >
> > I wonder do we have any ad hoc way to limit it? It looks like Linux
> > kernel does more sanity checks and does not blindly trust data.
> 
> The entry point structure has a two-byte field for total SMBIOS table length,
> so that can put an upper limit on the string sets.
> 
> >
> 
> Thanks for the detailed review.  I hope to be able to be able to send a new
> revision later in the week.
> 
> Side note: A new major version of the SMBIOS specification was posted last
> week which includes 64-bit addresses and such.  I'm not planning to try to
> add this at the moment, unless anyone has a need for it.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> David

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]