grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: Move TARGET_* assignments earlier


From: Daniel Kiper
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: Move TARGET_* assignments earlier
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:14:17 +0100
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

Adding John and Eric...

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:51:41PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> From: Mike Gilbert <address@hidden>
>
> On a 32-bit SPARC userland, configure fails to compile assembly and the
> build fails:
>
>     checking for options to compile assembly... configure: error: could not 
> compile assembly
>
> config.log shows:
>
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S: Assembler messages:
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S:5: Error: Architecture mismatch on "lduw [%o4+4],%o4".
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S:5: (Requires v9|v9a|v9b|v9c|v9d|v9e|v9v|v9m|m8; 
> requested architecture is sparclite.)
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S:7: Error: Architecture mismatch on "stw %o5,[%o3]".
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S:7: (Requires v9|v9a|v9b|v9c|v9d|v9e|v9v|v9m|m8; 
> requested architecture is sparclite.)
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S:8: Error: Architecture mismatch on "bne,pt %icc,1b 
> ,pt %icc,1b".
>     asm-tests/sparc64.S:8: (Requires v9|v9a|v9b|v9c|v9d|v9e|v9v|v9m|m8; 
> requested architecture is sparclite.)
>
> Simply moving these blocks earlier in configure.ac is sufficient to
> ensure that the tests are executed with the appropriate flags
> (specifically -m64 in this case).
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/667850

Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper <address@hidden> for both patches...

If there are no objections I will push these patches next week.

Daniel

> ---
>  configure.ac | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index e07ba4b56..b5e31c787 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -562,6 +562,24 @@ CPPFLAGS="$TARGET_CPPFLAGS"
>  LDFLAGS="$TARGET_LDFLAGS"
>  LIBS=""
>
> +if test "x$target_m32" = x1; then
> +  # Force 32-bit mode.
> +  TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -m32"
> +  TARGET_CCASFLAGS="$TARGET_CCASFLAGS -m32"
> +  TARGET_CPPFLAGS="$TARGET_CPPFLAGS -m32"
> +  TARGET_LDFLAGS="$TARGET_LDFLAGS -m32"
> +  TARGET_MODULE_FORMAT="elf32"
> +fi
> +
> +if test "x$target_m64" = x1; then
> +  # Force 64-bit mode.
> +  TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -m64"
> +  TARGET_CCASFLAGS="$TARGET_CCASFLAGS -m64"
> +  TARGET_CPPFLAGS="$TARGET_CPPFLAGS -m64"
> +  TARGET_LDFLAGS="$TARGET_LDFLAGS -m64"
> +  TARGET_MODULE_FORMAT="elf64"
> +fi
> +
>  # debug flags.
>  TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS $WARN_FLAGS -g -Wredundant-decls 
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations"
>  TARGET_CCASFLAGS="$TARGET_CCASFLAGS -g"
> @@ -750,24 +768,6 @@ if test "x$target_cpu" = xi386 && test "x$platform" != 
> xemu; then
>    TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -march=i386"
>  fi
>
> -if test "x$target_m32" = x1; then
> -  # Force 32-bit mode.
> -  TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -m32"
> -  TARGET_CCASFLAGS="$TARGET_CCASFLAGS -m32"
> -  TARGET_CPPFLAGS="$TARGET_CPPFLAGS -m32"
> -  TARGET_LDFLAGS="$TARGET_LDFLAGS -m32"
> -  TARGET_MODULE_FORMAT="elf32"
> -fi
> -
> -if test "x$target_m64" = x1; then
> -  # Force 64-bit mode.
> -  TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -m64"
> -  TARGET_CCASFLAGS="$TARGET_CCASFLAGS -m64"
> -  TARGET_CPPFLAGS="$TARGET_CPPFLAGS -m64"
> -  TARGET_LDFLAGS="$TARGET_LDFLAGS -m64"
> -  TARGET_MODULE_FORMAT="elf64"
> -fi
> -
>  if test "x$grub_cv_cc_target_clang" = xno && test "x$target_cpu" = xi386 && 
> test "x$platform" != xemu && test "x$platform" != xefi; then
>     TARGET_CFLAGS="$TARGET_CFLAGS -mrtd -mregparm=3"
>  fi
> --
> 2.24.1



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]