[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] error: Use format code llu for 64-bit uint bp->blk_
From: |
Daniel Kiper |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] error: Use format code llu for 64-bit uint bp->blk_prop in grub_error |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:17:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:10:52PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:05:09 +0100
> Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:47:13PM -0600, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > > For some reason PRIuGRUB_UINT64_T is not expanding to llu, but to
> > > lu, which causes the format string check to fail. Use literal and
> > > force cast until this is debugged.
> >
> > I think the problem is that currently BF64_DECODE() uses "1ULL". I
> > think it should look like this
> >
> > #define BF64_DECODE(x, low, len) P2PHASE((x) >> (low),
> > ((grub_uint64_t) 1) << (len))
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > #define BF64_DECODE(x, low, len) P2PHASE((x) >> (low), 1ULL <<
> > (len))
> >
> > Same or similar for other macros there.
> >
> > I would prefer if you fix macros in include/grub/zfs/spa.h first and
> > then do proper fix here.
>
> Yep, completely agree, just hadn't figured out a proper solution. And
> not being familiar with the code and not doing the zfs functional tests
> (GitLab CI shared runners do not have zfs kernel support), I'm hesitant
> to make such intrusive changes. However, your suggestion is the better
> way to do it and I've confirmed that it work on i386 and x86_64. I'll
> update the patch in the next patch series.
I am still afraid doing that before release until we are able to confirm
that everything works for 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. If not I would
not merge this patch and next one at this point.
Daniel
- Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] error: Use format code llu for 64-bit uint bp->blk_prop in grub_error,
Daniel Kiper <=