[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB 2.06
From: |
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB 2.06 |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:43:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 |
On 4/20/21 7:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> My 2 cents:
>
> If a distro starts shipping a new version of GCC, they should really
> test their packages first and patch them as needed.
>
> If an end user installs a new version of GCC manually, I would hope
> they are smart enough to know that it might break things.
>
> If an end user builds GRUB manually, they are also responsible for
> applying any patches that are necessary for their toolchain.
Fully agree on all points. And while I cannot speak for Gentoo, I know that
Fedora, Debian and openSUSE did full archive rebuilds with gcc-10 when it
was released.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
- Re: GRUB 2.06, (continued)
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Daniel Kiper, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Didier Spaier, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Eli Schwartz, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Daniel Kiper, 2021/04/21
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Mike Gilbert, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Bruce Dubbs, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06, Mike Gilbert, 2021/04/20
- Re: GRUB 2.06,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <=
Re: GRUB 2.06, Eli Schwartz, 2021/04/20