|
From: | John Paul Adrian Glaubitz |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Remove HFS support |
Date: | Fri, 19 Aug 2022 20:38:30 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.2 |
On 8/19/22 20:09, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 04:03:38PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:On Aug 19, 2022, at 3:59 PM, Daniel Kiper <dkiper@net-space.pl> wrote: If I do not hear any major objections in the following weeks I will merge this patch or a variant of it in the second half of September.We’re still formatting our /boot partitions for Debian PowerPC for PowerMacs using HFS, so this change would be a breaking change for us. So, that would be a no from Debian’s side.Not so fast please, Adrian. At the risk of sounding harsh, non-release old ports like powerpc *really* don't get to dictate things in Debian terms.
Add "Ports" to this.
As Daniel Axtens has been finding out, the HFS code is terrible in terms of security. If you still need it for old/semi-dead machines, maybe you should fork an older grub release and stay with that?
I don't know what should be the deal with the security of a boot loader to be honest. If someone has access to your hardware so they can control your bootloader, you have much worse problems anyway. Forking is also a terrible idea as every forked package means having to track it manually. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |