Re: Unified name properties

[Marius Vollmer]

Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:

> How about unifying these procedures by a single procedure `name',
> using the new property scheme?

Yes, that was the idea.
 
>   (define name (make-object-property))
> 
>   (name assq) => assq
>   (name <class>) => <class>
> 
> This is also compatible with generic functions.

In what way?  In the case we want to change `name' to be a generic
function?