[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1 |
Date: |
06 Feb 2001 02:42:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:
> I thought the following code does not work
>
> /* Undump a cell */
> SCM_NEWCELL (obj);
> scm_restore_object (&SCM_CDR (obj), dstate);
> scm_restore_object (&SCM_CAR (obj), dstate);
>
> but actually, it works... Isn't this dangerous?
why would it be dangerous?
> Yes, I'll create a table that maps stored typecodes to real tc
> values.
by name?
--
I think we might have been better off with a slide rule.
-- Zaphod Beeblebrox
- Guile Binary Format 0.0, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/03
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.0, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/02/03
- Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/05
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/06
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/06
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/07
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/02/08
- Re: Guile Binary Format 0.1, Michael Livshin, 2001/02/19
Re: Guile Binary Format 0.0, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/02/04