Re: [Patch] CVS-Guile compilation problems

[Matthias Koeppe]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> Would it suffice to just use this?
> 
>     next_symbol:
>       ;
>     }
> 
> "(void)0" looks strange.

I don't think that a singleton ";" is a C statement.  That's why one
has to write `do { ... } while (0)' in all these preprocessor macros
-- just to avoid a singleton ";".

I use (void)0 all the time as a no-op expression.  It's just as
strange as C is.

-- 
Matthias Köppe -- http://www.math.uni-magdeburg.de/~mkoeppe