[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_must_malloc() vs. malloc()
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: scm_must_malloc() vs. malloc() |
Date: |
19 Mar 2001 12:19:41 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> this is because there is some piggy-backing logic inside of
> `scm_must_malloc', namely the malloc threshold logic. since malloc
> threshold only makes sense for memory that is likely to be freed by
> GC, the name `scm_must_malloc' loses the last bits of its
> intuitiveness.
OK. I'll try and remember to check that we're using it properly in
gnucash and g-wrap.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930