[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-vm 0.3
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: guile-vm 0.3 |
Date: |
12 Apr 2001 11:45:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> 2) you do explicitly say that this IL is Scheme-oriented. what would
> be the minimal set of additions to make it suitable as a target for
> an Elisp compiler? for CL? for Python?
IMO, this would be *very* nice, and perhaps having a language neutral
IL is more likely to succeed than other-language->guile front ends.
I think it would be wonderful if we ended up with a really good hybrid
IL -> byte-code/jit-machine code compiler that could host a variety of
languages. Sounds like a tall order, though :>
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, (continued)
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/09
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/11
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Evan Prodromou, 2001/04/11
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/11
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Rob Browning, 2001/04/12
- Re: guile-vm 0.3, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/12
Re: guile-vm 0.3, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/01
Re: guile-vm 0.3, Evan Prodromou, 2001/04/03