[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm? |
|
Date: |
08 May 2001 12:20:48 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> I agree that RELEASE should be properly maintained, but it may happen that
> people forget to update it. The information can still be extracted from
> the code by looking at uses of SCM_DEBUG_DEPRECATED and the scheme level
Personally, I don't have any problem with having the version number of
the guile version in which something was deprecated be an argument to
SCM_DEBUG_DEPRECATED. Doesn't seem like it could hurt, and it might
help. We'll at least have a hard record of when we deprecated
something right where it's defined, but we could also probably get by
just fine with RELEASE alone...
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930