Re: On uninterned symbols

[Martin Grabmueller]

> From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
> Date: 18 May 2001 00:18:38 +0200
> 
> Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > This is my suggestion, as Marius seemed to want the feature of
> > reading in uninterned symbols again, and have them eq? to the
> > original (uninterned) symbols.
> 
> Err, no, they needn't be identical to the original symbols, but we
> should have a way to print s-expressions that contain multiple
> references to one uninterned symbol, have them read back in so that
> the multiple references still point to only one symbol, but this
> symbol might be different from any other existing symbol.

Oh, I see.  I have misunderstood you on this.  Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
  'martin