[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feature request
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: feature request |
Date: |
28 May 2001 13:10:14 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Another very interesting issue came up in a private discussion with
> > Michael: When giving the compile time option -W in addition to -Wall to
> > gcc, it will display quite some more usefull warning messages. Among them
> > are empty if blocks (helped me to fix a bug in ramap.c), comparisons of
> > unsigned values against >= 0 (which is always true and thus indicates a
> > potential signedness problem), and comparisons of signed against unsigned
> > variables. From the latter there are still quite a lot remaining, but I
> > guess it doesn't make much sense to check them before we make scm_bits_t
> > into an unsigned type.
>
> want to make -W be part of the default CFLAGS?
er. duh. sorry, I read the above faster than my still-sleeping brain
could digest it, apparently.
--
Our users will know fear and cower before our software. Ship it! Ship
it and let them flee like the dogs they are!
-- Klingon Programmer
- feature request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2001/05/20
- Re: feature request, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/24
- Re: feature request, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/27
- Re: feature request, Rob Browning, 2001/05/28
- Re: feature request, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/28
- Re: feature request, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/05/28
- Re: feature request, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/28
- Re: feature request, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/05/28
- Re: feature request, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/29
- Re: feature request, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/29
- Re: feature request, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/05/29
- Re: feature request, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/05/29
- Re: feature request, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/29