[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken GC
From: |
Miroslav Silovic |
Subject: |
Re: broken GC |
Date: |
17 Aug 2001 02:10:09 +0200 |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> a non-moving GenGC is a possibility (and something I actually plan
> to play with "soon") -- but it remains to be seen how effective that
> is.
I've been hacking a non-copying variant of TRAIN. No working code yet,
but it's been an easy-going code. However, what I have so far is not
optimised for a cell-based heap.
--
How to eff the ineffable?
- Re: broken GC, (continued)
- Re: broken GC, Rob Browning, 2001/08/16
- Re: broken GC, Michael Livshin, 2001/08/16
- Re: broken GC,
Miroslav Silovic <=
- Re: broken GC, Michael Livshin, 2001/08/17
- Re: broken GC, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/19
- Re: broken GC, Michael Livshin, 2001/08/25
- Re: broken GC, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/25