[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange memoizing behavior
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Strange memoizing behavior |
Date: |
22 Jan 2002 13:29:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > From: Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:34:32 +0100
> >
> > Shouldn't Guile report that the (FOO AND) form is bad?
> >
> > badness is up to the user to define -- passing macros may actually be
> > useful sometimes. to help distinguish, try:
> >
> > (primitive-macro? and) => #t
> >
> > note that this relies on being able to pass the macro!
>
> Indeed, we cannot disallow passing macros to functions because that
> would effectively destroy their first-class status.
yes. it also would allow Guile not to be stuck in interpreter-land
forever. I fail to see how that would be a bad thing.
--
You know better than to trust a strange computer.
- Strange memoizing behavior, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/01/17
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/01/21
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/01/22
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Rob Browning, 2002/01/24
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/01/24
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Michael Livshin, 2002/01/24
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/01/24
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Michael Livshin, 2002/01/24
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Marius Vollmer, 2002/01/24
- Re: Strange memoizing behavior, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/01/25