[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version.
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version. |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Aug 2002 23:57:24 +0300 |
> Which is exactly the problem. Guile should *not* be exporting
> its config.h header. Further, since Guile should not be doing
> it, anyone depending upon the Guile-configured values has mis-
> coded their program. On that theory, the config header Guile
> exports should be free to prefix all its values. Guile should
> do this.
[...]
> > Imagine a developer who wishes to use Guile as an extension
> > language for his package, he then would need to change almost all his
> > configuration suite.
>
> To the contrary. Guile needs to do this.
Agreed to both points. Another (yet related) question: Should
guile-doc-snarf stuff be installed to bin as guile-snarf is? I believe
it should. If a developer needs to use guile-snarf then he will surely
need to use guile-doc-snarf, yet the latter is a noinst_SCRIPTS
target. I guess this is inconsistent.
For example, the GNU radius project provides a set of scheme
primitives via SCM_DEFINE. To process the sources I need to include
in the package a copy of guile-doc-snarf (for version 1.4 as well as
for 1.6). It would be a lot easier if Guile had installed all the
snarfers.
Regards,
Sergey
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., (continued)
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 2002/08/01
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/08/01
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 2002/08/01
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Bruce Korb, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/08/03
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Bruce Korb, 2002/08/04
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version.,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 2002/08/01
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., rm, 2002/08/02
- Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 2002/08/02
Re: Release Guile, now ;-) [was:] Re: GC rewrite, first version., Rob Browning, 2002/08/02