[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?)
From: |
rm |
Subject: |
Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?) |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:23:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 01:29:09PM +0200, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> It is an opaque argument...
>
> > - what is passed to the init function in the void pointer and
> > what is the function supposed to return?
>
> ... that is simply passed to the init function when it is invoked.
So this is "userdata", i see.
> (This makes the init function a "C closure".) The init function
> returns nothing (it has "void" return type).
<blush>Grumpf! I _hate_ C's function pointer syntax ... </blush>
> >> I believe it's only an accident that the functions are not documented
> >> (except for the NEWS blurb). I think documentation should be added;
> >> the changes should also go into the 1.6 release. Preliminary
> >> documentation can be found in the above message by Marius.
> >
> > Should this be documented soon?
>
> Ralf, maybe you want to prepare a patch that adds the documentation to
> Guile.
This was partly implied by my question. But i first need to finish up
the docs on "guardians from C" i promised earlier this week (got dis-
tracted by all that module stuff which i need to get working asap).
Ralf
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), (continued)
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/08
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 2002/08/08
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 2002/08/09
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 2002/08/19
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 2002/08/19
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Matthias Koeppe, 2002/08/09
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), rm, 2002/08/09
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Matthias Koeppe, 2002/08/09
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?),
rm <=
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/10
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/11
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dirk Herrmann, 2002/08/17
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 2002/08/19
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dirk Herrmann, 2002/08/24
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Neil Jerram, 2002/08/26
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/26
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/21
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/12
- Re: What replaces scm_register_module_xxx (Doc update?), Dale P. Smith, 2002/08/17