[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables |
Date: |
14 Aug 2002 21:35:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
address@hidden writes:
> I'd propose a slight modification, though: use one flag for the setter,
> one for the getter, like so:
Good idea!
> It looks more symmetric ;-) and it's still possible to implement
> `unsettable' variables (by appropriately implementing a setter
> function which does nothing, complains, whatever seems
> appropriate). I think it's even more flexible.
Read-onlyness should be a property of a variable that can be detected
by the compiler so we wouldn't want to bury it only in the setter, I'd
say.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/13
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15