[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: port initialization?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: port initialization? |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2002 00:06:33 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> Hmm, yes. It's about on par with the smob functions I'd say, and we
> do export those. The new scm_new_port_table_entry is much easier to
> use than the old scm_add_to_port_table, so we should deprecate
> scm_add_to_port_table.
Done.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
- Re: port initialization?, (continued)
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/16
- Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/08
- Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/09
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/10
- Re: port initialization?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/11
Re: port initialization?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/08/08