[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in syncase
From: |
Lynn Winebarger |
Subject: |
Re: bug in syncase |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 04:29:36 -0500 |
On Thursday 14 November 2002 23:10, Clinton Ebadi wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2002 06:59, Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> > the separation of memoization and execution is going forward. However,
> > there is one thing that I cannot solve by myself (or at least, which would
> > take me too long). Guile now does not accept the following any more:
> >
> > guile> define
> > ERROR: In procedure expression:
> > ERROR: Misplaced syntactic keyword
> > ABORT: (misc-error)
>
> That shouldn't be a bug. In every other scheme system that is a perfectly
> valid statement since there are no "magic" operators in Scheme. I don't see
> the advantage of making it impossible to do things like this. Guile should be
> fixed, not syncase.
>
Nonsense. Here's the response in Petite Chez Scheme:
> define
Error: invalid syntax define.
Type (debug) to enter the debugger.
>
What scheme systems are you refering to?
Lynn