[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: goops and memoization
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: goops and memoization |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 20:56:18 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:
> 2. Goops method optimizations should not be done in advance. They are
> supposed to be performed at the exact instance when a generic
> function is called with a particular combination of argument types
> for the first time. That is of course possible to reconcile with
> the steps above, although steps 3-4 will be folded into the
> execution.
Hmm. So what's your impression of how GOOPS might (or might not) fit
in with offline compilation where you might want to produce a .o file
that will be executed later?
(Note that although I've been talking about offline compilation, I'm
not dead set on it, but I would like to understand the issues
involved more clearly.)
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/12/03
Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/12/03