Re: scm_make_gsubr question

[Marius Vollmer]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > - The corresponding operation on the Scheme level is achieved much
> >   more elegantly by closure.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > - The most sensible approach IMO for a Guile-based application is to
> >   do the minimum possible in C for the maximum benefit in Scheme.
> 
> I tend to agree.  I wonder how often a user_data solution would be
> better than restructuring the problem...

However, when his patch is nice and clean, we can have it both!  We do
already have 'compiled closures', but I think they are a bit
obscure...

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405