Re: srfi-1 delete proc arg order

[Marius Vollmer]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I applied this change to the head, someone else can make an
> > executive decision about the 1.6 branch.
> 
> Marius, any opinion?  Technically it's a bug fix as measured against
> the documentation, but if people have already accomodated this bug in
> their code, and just not said anything, the change would mean breakage
> for them...

Tough call.  We just _can't_ offer a SRFI-1 that doesn't work like the
SRFI document says.  That would be silly.  It's also impossible to fix
this in a backwards compatible way.

The SRFI must win, so we have to break backwards compatability.

Kevin, please make the change in 1.6 as well and put a nice big note
at the top of NEWS.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405