Re: doco srfi-13 string-replace

[Martin Grabmueller]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 01:08:20AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:

> Hmmm.  There is not much value in extending an SRFI, I'd say.  People
> can't really use our extensions if they want to stay portable.
> However, since we have that code, we should document it.  So, please
> document that behavior but clearly mark it as a "Guile extension".

Just for information: when I wrote the code for this SRFI, I only had
the draft version of the SRFI document, so there may be some more errors
in the code due to this fact.  It would be best to adjust the code to
match the final SRFI, instead of introducing extensions.

'martin