Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS

[Klaus Schilling]

From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:16:43 +0000

> Elf <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > (i usually start people off with guile nowadays,
> > despite its non-r5 compliance, as the wizard book is still around r4 
> > material.)
> 
> I hope you don't mind me emailing you in response to your r6rs post;
> I'm one of the Guile developers.
> 
> I wondered if you could say more about the r5-non-compliance that you
> perceive?  I thought we had solved all r5 compliance issues by now.

no, as Guile's symbols are still case-sensitive which is illegal in r5rs

Klaus Schilling