Re: srfi-18 requirements

[Julian Graham]

Hi Ludovic,

Thanks so much for your comments!  I'll try to address this stuff
tonight.  Stress-testing on NetBSD sounds good!


Thanks,
Julian


On Nov 28, 2007 1:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Overall, the patch looks good to me and your explanations were helpful.
> The caveat is that I'm not familiar with SRFI-18 and not too comfortable
> with these parts of the pthread API that you're wrapping, so I may well
> overlook a few things here and there.  I think we'll have to stress-test
> the thing on NetBSD since it's good a catching thread-related
> programming errors.
>
> My comments below are mostly cosmetic.  Once you're done with them,
> could you please provide a ChangeLog entry?
>
> Then we'll need to update the doc of the core API, and also add
> documentation of the SRFI module itself (the custom has been to somewhat
> duplicate SRFIs in the manual so that we have all documentation in one
> place).