[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Big Switch to Git
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: The Big Switch to Git |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:06:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> After reviewing what others have said on this, I'm inclined to agree
> with this lazy-import approach.
OK.
> Agreed. Except that I think that we should "cvs remove" everything
> that has been transferred to Git (once it is clear that the transfer
> was successful). (Because there should not be two possible sources
> for the guile-core files, that can only confuse people.)
Hmm, I'd prefer adding a `THIS-REPOSITORY-IS-DEAD' marker, as Han-Wen
suggested. We should also ask the Savannah hackers what other options
are available to somehow "hide" the repository without actually deleting
it.
> I think I can go ahead with this at any time, can't I? In other
> words: ticking this option won't automatically do anything bad to the
> existing CVS infrastructure, will it?
Yes, you can do it anytime, and as long as you don't "untick" the "CVS
Repository" feature, nothing bad will happen. ;-)
Thanks,
Ludo'.
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/03/15
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/03/21
Re: The Big Switch to Git, Neil Jerram, 2008/03/24
- Re: The Big Switch to Git,
Ludovic Courtès <=