[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Internal visibility
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Internal visibility |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jun 2008 21:48:16 +0100 |
2008/6/1 Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>:
>
> It's just that it's convenient and equivalent to 1.6's `SCM_STRING_CHARS ()',
> so people have come to use it... According to Google's codesearch,
> `scm_i_string_chars ()' is used by Mailutils, Lilypond, AutoGen, SND and
> a few others.
IMO that amounts to a strong case for making it an official API. I
believe the argument against doing that is something to do with future
multi- and variable-byte string encodings - but perhaps we can handle
that as a transitional issue once those encodings are in place?
Neil
- Re: Internal visibility, Neil Jerram, 2008/06/01
- Re: Internal visibility, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/06/01
- Re: Internal visibility, Neil Jerram, 2008/06/09
- Re: Internal visibility, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/06/09
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/10
- Re: Internal visibility, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/06/10
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/10
- Re: Internal visibility, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility, Mike Gran, 2008/06/12