[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Internal visibility
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Internal visibility |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:18:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> What do I use if I want to have guaranteed O(1) indexing -that is- if
> I want to manipulate strings of bytes?
That's an interesting but different story: whether `string-{ref,set!}'
are O(1) doesn't influence the Scheme/C string conversion API design
since, again, it's not desirable to expose Guile's internal string
representation.
(If you really want to investigate that question, Will Clinger has a
very good page on the topic:
http://larceny.ccs.neu.edu/larceny-trac/wiki/StringRepresentations .)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: Internal visibility, (continued)
- Re: Internal visibility, Neil Jerram, 2008/06/09
- Re: Internal visibility, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/06/09
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/10
- Re: Internal visibility, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/06/10
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/10
- Re: Internal visibility, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility, Mike Gran, 2008/06/12
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/23
- Re: Internal visibility, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Internal visibility, Clinton Ebadi, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/11
- Re: Internal visibility, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/06/14
- Re: Internal visibility, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/06/23
- Re: Internal visibility, Neil Jerram, 2008/06/11