Re: the new gc asserts in master

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>>> I'm still in favor of "git revert" since the log message makes it clear
>>> which patch was reverted and why.  "We" can then take our time and work
>>> out a proper fix, and finally re-merge the patch plus its fix.
>>> Furthermore, in the eventuality where none of us eventually finds a fix,
>>> `master' is left in the previous state, which is better IMO.
>> 'master' in its previous states grows the heap to 600M doing the 1000-fold
>> version of srfi-18 test I posted. I think it's not a good solution.
>>
>> Commenting out the assert for x86-64 should yield better behavior.
> 
> Alright, then please go ahead.

Pushed (without changelog entry).

-- 
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen