[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wide strings
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Wide strings |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:15:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> Do we need to talk more about what needs to be accomplished? Do we
>>> need a complete specification? Do we need a vote on if it is a good
>>> idea?
>>
>> I think you're going in the right direction. More importantly, although
>> I can't speak for them, Neil and Ludo seem to think so too.
>
> Yes, as far as I'm concerned. I know you're probably more knowledgeable
> than I am on this issue and I'm confident.
For the record, I'm happy too - in fact I'm excited that Guile is
finally going to have wide strings. Technically I think I'm less of
an expert here than everyone else who has commented, so I'm happy to
defer to the apparent consensus. I see that Clinton's idea goes
beyond that, but (IIUC) it looks like we doesn't lose anything by
going with Latin-1/UCS-32 now, and then Clinton's idea could be added
later; is that correct?
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Wide strings, (continued)
- Re: Wide strings, Mike Gran, 2009/01/25
- Re: Wide strings, Mike Gran, 2009/01/26
- Re: Wide strings, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/01/26
- Re: Wide strings, Mike Gran, 2009/01/27
- Re: Wide strings, Mike Gran, 2009/01/27
- Re: Wide strings, Andy Wingo, 2009/01/27
- Re: Wide strings, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/01/27
- Re: Wide strings, Mike Gran, 2009/01/28
- Re: Wide strings, Andy Wingo, 2009/01/28
- Re: Wide strings, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/01/28
- Re: Wide strings,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Wide strings, Clinton Ebadi, 2009/01/28
- Re: Wide strings, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/01/28