Re: eval-case and toplevel prohibitions

[Neil Jerram]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> So I was thinking: why do we have this fetish for prohibiting certain
> forms in a non-toplevel context? I am of a mind to replace eval-case
> with eval-when, which is actually more expressive, as it allows us to
> discriminate the different phases in non-toplevel contexts as well.

I recall that Marius added the checks, but unfortunately not why.
Sorry!  Does googling help?

        Neil