[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:34:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
> However, they're testing for a POSIX 2008 requirement that C99 and
> POSIX 2004 implementations need not meet, namely that NULL be of type
> "void *" instead of any null pointer constant (e.g., "0"). I think
> requiring POSIX 2008 support for Guile and anything that builds on it
> seems like a bad idea. I haven't looked at the libunistring code to
> see why it might be relevant, but it seems like a pretty gratuitous
> imposition to me. The only benefit of it I can see is that a variadic
> function can then take NULL as an argument without casting to char*;
> is that worth refusing to support other systems?
I didn't know it was a POSIX 2008 requirement. Then indeed, we should
discuss this with the libunistring folks.
Thanks,
Ludo'.
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, (continued)
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/12
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/12
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/12
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11
- Re: i guess we're frozen & stuff, Greg Troxel, 2009/08/11