[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: entering and leaving guile mode, and GC stack protection
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: entering and leaving guile mode, and GC stack protection |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:06:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ken,
On Thu 06 Aug 2009 18:30, Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:06, I wrote:
>> (3) My four-year-old comments on scm_enter/leave_guile, recorded in
>> threads.c around line 300, still stand.... Those functions really
>> ought to go away. At least they're confined to one file, now. Some
>> of it looks a little messy, but I can probably get rid of some of the
>> uses....
>
> I've made a bit of progress on this.
The patches look good to me; my only wonder is what relation they have
to the BDW-GC branch Ludovic was working on. If BDW will land before
2.0, then perhaps all this mess can go away (wishful thinking);
otherwise we should apply it now (after the release). Ludovic? :)
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/04
- Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Marijn Schouten (hkBst), 2009/08/04
- Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Andy Wingo, 2009/08/05
- Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/05
- entering and leaving guile mode, and GC stack protection (was Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled), Ken Raeburn, 2009/08/06
- Re: entering and leaving guile mode, and GC stack protection,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: entering and leaving guile mode, and GC stack protection, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/14
Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/08/08
Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Andy Wingo, 2009/08/05
Re: guile performance - Ackermann function: way slower than emacs, slower still if compiled, Andy Wingo, 2009/08/05