|
| From: | Mark H Weaver |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] %nil-handling optimization and fixes v1 |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:00:43 -0400 |
Neil Jerram wrote:
> FWIW, dropping "lisp_" looks OK, but I'm not sure about dropping
> "and_". "scm_is_false_not_nil" feels notably harder to understand
> than "scm_is_false_and_not_nil".
Yes, I see your point, and I agree.
Mark
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |