Re: srfe records in reworked match

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed 21 Apr 2010 10:40, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> FWIW I’d really prefer if it could work with SRFI-9 (which is purely
>> syntactic, so there’s no run-time record type descriptor) rather than
>> with Guile’s records (as above).
>
> There is a run-time rtd, of sorts; it is the struct-vtable.

Yes, but it’s Guile-specific.

> There would be no penalty making Guile's records interoperable with
> SRFI-9 records.

Currently Guile’s SRFI-9 accessors are “integratable” whereas record
accessors aren’t.  IOW, until Guile has an inliner, there’d be a penalty
making them interoperable.

Thanks,
Ludo’.