[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fmatch
From: |
stefan |
Subject: |
Re: fmatch |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 23:31:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.2-desktop; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Saturday 22 May 2010 11:03:12 pm Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> > Shall we say that we use the slightly modified version of (ice-9 match)
> > that ypu dug up for now!
>
> Hmm, yes? Please send an actual patch against Guile master, so we have
> something concrete do discuss. :-)
Yep, I will do that.
> Can you make sure to isolate Guile-specific changes, ideally in a way
> that allows us to include upstream files (match.scm itself and test
> cases) unmodified? See the sxml and lalr modules for examples.
will do.
> > On a side note I have not gotten any answer from the author of that code
> > that I modified.
>
> Hmm that’s unfortunate.
Yes, maybe ask on irc? what channel?
> If we can’t get record-matching included upstream shortly, then I’d
> suggest making the addition of record-matching a separate commit in our
> repository, so we can easily find it in the future.
Separate commit?
> Could you do that?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
>
Ludo, I'm relly a beginner in some respects so be patient :-)
Cheers!
Stefan
- Re: fmatch, (continued)
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/09
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/09
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/10
- Re: fmatch, Stefan, 2010/05/11
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/17
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/22
- Re: fmatch,
stefan <=
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/23
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/23
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/24
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/24
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/25
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/25