[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:50:37 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat 29 Jan 2011 09:20, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> * libguile/numbers.c (scm_div, scm_mod, scm_div_and_mod, scm_div0,
> scm_mod0, scm_div0_and_mod0): New extensible procedures `div', `mod',
> `div-and-mod', `div0', `mod0', `div0-and-mod0'.
I wonder; should we use Taylor Campbell's names? From
http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/DivisionRiastradh. I am inclined to
think so. It doesn't seem to me that there is any special reason to
take the R6RS names here.
What do you think?
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, (continued)
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/28
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/28
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/29
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/29
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/29
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/30
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes,
Andy Wingo <=
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/29
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/29
Commentary: R6RS div0-and-mod0 vs Taylor's `round/', Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/30
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/30
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/30
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Mark H Weaver, 2011/01/30
Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/28