[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:07:45 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed 23 Feb 2011 21:14, Bruce Korb <address@hidden> writes:
> * Developers should be clearly warned that -I/usr/local/include
> needs to be after all other -I options, due to guile
> header naming conflicts.
This is incorrect. Guile 2.0 (and later) does not add
-I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS in any configuration. If you install
to /usr/local, it adds -I/usr/local/include/guile/2.0, or /2.2, etc.
The problem this thread is about is if you have Guile 1.8 or previous
eheaders installed in /usr.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, (continued)
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, nalaginrut, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/02/23
- scm_listofnull, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/23
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/24
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/02/24
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/25
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/25
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/25
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/25
Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Mark H Weaver, 2011/02/22