[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
binary-port?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
binary-port? |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:28:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110015 (No Gnus v0.15) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
I just pushed 96128014bfaabe9e123c4f4928ce4c20427eaa53, which makes
‘binary-port?’ deterministic for ports intended to be binary.
However, I’m wondering whether we should not just squarely do away with
the binary/textual distinction, and just write:
(define (binary-port? p) #t)
What do people with experience with pure R6RS code think? Is the
distinction actually used, and how?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- binary-port?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: binary-port?, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/22
- Re: binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/23
- Re: binary-port?, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?, Andy Wingo, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?, Andreas Rottmann, 2011/04/25
- Re: binary-port?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/04/26