[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:08:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed 14 Dec 2011 08:50, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> I have successfully implemented the (capture-lexical-environment)
> special form in the evaluator, and also primitive-local-eval.
I dunno, Mark. That's a neat hack, but why should we have it in Guile?
It can't compile. It's not for efficiency, because if you wanted more
efficiency, you would compile. So what is it for? It has a cost, so it
needs to justify itself.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `capture-lexical-environment' in evaluator, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `capture-lexical-environment' in evaluator, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/14
- [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, David Kastrup, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Peter TB Brett, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, David Kastrup, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Implement `the-environment' and `local-eval' in evaluator, Hans Aberg, 2011/12/16
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/14