[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:52:03 +0100 |
On 15 Dec 2011, at 11:21, Andy Wingo wrote:
> The "delayed evaluation" thread is a bit long and confusing, so I would
> like to try to summarize it.
>
> Lilypond has a way to embed Lilypond code in Scheme, and Scheme code in
> Lilypond code. The former uses a reader macro, #{#}. The latter uses
> specially-marked variables and expressions, specifically, those preceded
> by $ or #.
...
> It took some time for everyone to understand the problem. In the end,
> there were four workable possibilities.
>
> 1) Keep using closures.
When doing a parser on top of Guile, I noticed one must first build an
unevaluated closure, and only thereafter call the evaluator. Scheme has some
restrictions forcing this, for example, the lambda cannot appear as a free
symbol, though it is possible in Guile using scm_sym_lambda.
It might be useful with a variation of scm_eval_string() that only parses and
builds the closure, but not calls the evaluator.
Hans
- summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/15
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, David Kastrup, 2011/12/15
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/16
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, David Kastrup, 2011/12/16
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/18
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/18
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, Noah Lavine, 2011/12/18
- Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval, David Kastrup, 2011/12/18