guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
Subject: Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:45:46 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) 
() Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
() Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:04:13 -0400

   However, I find the term 'set' misleading, since no mutation is
   taking place.  Maybe 'update'?  I dunno, I don't have strong
   feelings on this.

How about ‘overlay’ (or ‘over-set’ or ‘mask’) or ‘interpose’ or
‘insinuate’ or ‘twiddle’ or ‘frob’ or ‘actually’ or ‘imho’ or some
combination of the previous and prefix ‘w/’ (e.g., ‘w/ho’)?
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]