[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:57:13 +0800 |
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 10:50 +0100, Daniel Llorens wrote:
> > On 5 December 2012 15:21, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > I don't think it's proper to use (ansi term-color)
> > purposely, since it's not in Guile.
>
> Maybe we should start moving a few things from guile-lib into Guile proper.
>
> (ansi term-color) may be a candidate. I think that (os process) should be
> merged in Guile in some form, run-with-pipe has appeared in the lists a few
> times.
>
No against for me.
And IIRC, I've expressed my desire for adding (os process). I ever wrote
my own implementation for one project since I didn't find one in Guile.
> Regards
>
> Daniel
>
>
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/12/09
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Nala Ginrut, 2012/12/09
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/12/10
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Nala Ginrut, 2012/12/10
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Nala Ginrut, 2012/12/11
- Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Nala Ginrut, 2012/12/31
Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL, Daniel Llorens, 2012/12/05