[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About Guile crypto support
From: |
Daniel Hartwig |
Subject: |
Re: About Guile crypto support |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Feb 2013 09:37:39 +0800 |
On 9 February 2013 00:21, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Yeah, apparently there are several half-baked bindings around. Let’s
> just polish one of them, and submit it for inclusion in libgcrypt.
I have already submitted some additions to one, but I may just continue
in a new repository.
By the way, I very much like the conventions used in the GnuTLS
bindings. The enums in particular make a lot of sense for a security
library, with the extreme type safety they provide. I will pursue a
similar approach.
One question. With the current state of FFI, do you think it matters
much whether the bulk of the bindings are done in C or FFI?
Regards
- Re: About Guile crypto support, (continued)
Re: About Guile crypto support, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/04
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Nala Ginrut, 2013/02/04
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/05
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Daniel Hartwig, 2013/02/05
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Daniel Hartwig, 2013/02/05
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/08
- Re: About Guile crypto support,
Daniel Hartwig <=
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/09
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Andy Wingo, 2013/02/09
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/09
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Noah Lavine, 2013/02/09
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/09
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Andy Wingo, 2013/02/11
- Re: About Guile crypto support, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/02/11
Re: About Guile crypto support, Mike Gran, 2013/02/11
Re: About Guile crypto support, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/11
Re: About Guile crypto support, Nala Ginrut, 2013/02/11