Re: guile-sources Digest, Vol 46, Issue 7

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

() "Issac Trotts" <address@hidden>
() Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:48:09 -0700

   Here's what it says:

   HEY: rv => 512  (status:exit-val rv) => 2
   FAIL: call-process.test: ls zzzzz.zzz (sep args)
   HEY: rv => 512  (status:exit-val rv) => 2
   FAIL: call-process.test: ls zzzzz.zzz (sep args) #:norm #t
   HEY: rv => 512  (status:exit-val rv) => 2
   FAIL: call-process.test: ls zzzzz.zzz #:norm #t
   FAIL: call-process-to-buffers.test: check-cp->b ls
   FAIL: call-process-to-buffers.test: check-cp->b ls
   FAIL: call-process-to-buffers.test: check-cp->b ls zzzzz.zzz
   SKIP: gpgutils.test (disabled by configuration)

thanks for re-running the tests.  looks like the problem is in the
tests; they are too picky.  for the next release, i have modified
them to clamp the expected return values to ok (zero) and not-ok
(non-zero) to account for variations in the exit value of the
at-large ls(1) programs.

updated tests are attached.  you should be able to drop them in,
overwriting the old files, and get a clean "make check" run.

thi

call-process.test
Description: updated call-process test

call-process-to-buffers.test
Description: updated call-process-to-buffers test