[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE FAQ
From: |
Roger Faust |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE FAQ |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:56:44 +0100 |
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, you wrote:
> Sorry, I couldn't quite follow the explanation for the format of this
> email. My question is this:
>
> Why use Guile instead of TCL or Perl or some other well-known, mature, and
> well documented scripting language?
>
That's a question which I wanted to asked myself. When I found Guile,
I thought that could be useful, but until now, I don't know much about
guile, basic examples didn't work by me (maybe my fault :().
> I read that Guile avoids the size etc etc of these venerable languages,
> but in browsing the pages hoping to pick up enough about Guile to convert
> me from TCL so I can be more helpful in new GNU projects all I learned is
> that the documentation isn't current enough to be useful and the
> legendary simplicity of extension hasn't been implemented yet (and that's
> from messages posted 6 months ago).
That's true everthing is quiet old, everywhere is writen one should
make a good documentation....I think it's heavy to learn something
about Guile.
Roger Faust
- GUILE FAQ, Nathan Lovell, 2001/01/20
- Re: GUILE FAQ,
Roger Faust <=
- GUILE FAQ, pax!, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Roger Faust, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Stefan Petersen, 2001/01/22
- Re: GUILE FAQ, Neil Jerram, 2001/01/23
- Re: GUILE FAQ, thi, 2001/01/22