[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble
|
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
|
Subject: |
Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble |
|
Date: |
09 Mar 2001 00:53:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:
> (A little weird though: This requirement would make practical work
> very difficult if we would follow it throughout. Which is the
> essential difference between me modifying psyntax.ss (which, BTW,
> wasn't originally covered by the GPL) and any guile developer doing
> the daily change of some piece of Guile code?
Hmm, maybe that the Guile code is copyright FSF and the FSF is not
bound by the license on its code?
- Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Ingo Ruhnke, 2001/03/06
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/03/07
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/03/07
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Keith Wright, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/03/08
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Keith Wright, 2001/03/09
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/03/10
- Re: Goops, set! and define-syntax throuble, Keith Wright, 2001/03/11