[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me? |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:44:00 -0700 |
From: Klaus Schilling <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:32:26 +0200
there are more jobs involving perl, and almost none involving scheme,
so most schemers are forced into programming in different languages
for a living.
i have to work w/ a whiny sycophant whose school of hard knocks consists
solely of C++, a pity. he complains about Scheme being hard! his
O(n^3) executables are 5MB (45 unstripped) and ... [insert standard C++
loathing here].
obGuile: this place of work was using guile-1.2 for a long time (before
logical ops worked w/ bignums), and only recently switched to guile-1.4.
they had coded up arbitrary-length variants for logand, logior, and
logxor, w/o contributing them back to guile. :-(
i'm hoping the user community henceforth doesn't feel so alienated...
(but on the other hand, maybe some distance is a good thing -- this same
C++ wonder wrote templated classes to wrap SCM -- gaaaaa!)
i wonder what's the guile-version-in-use distribution these days? 1.4
has been out awhile, but i hear of 1.3.4 and (as above) 1.2 sometimes.
thi
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, (continued)
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, tom, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Sam Tregar, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Sam Tregar, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Klaus Schilling, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Alex Shinn, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, rm, 2001/07/14
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Alex Shinn, 2001/07/14
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/13
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/14
- Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?), Evan Prodromou, 2001/07/14
- Re: Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/07/14
Re: No gh_set_x()?, Dirk Esser, 2001/07/13
Re: No gh_set_x()?, Steven G. Johnson, 2001/07/16